Environmental PM 2.5 , Physical Activity Levels, and Aerobic Capacity, of Smokers and Non-Smokers

Aerobic capacity of young men (19 years - 24 years) is high, but can be inﬂ uenced by many factors like physical activity, smoking, and air pollution with environmental PM 2.5 . Objectives: (a) - to estimate the aerobic capacity in young men (smokers and non-smokers) living in areas with higher PM 2.5 using Queen’s College Step Test (QCT). (b) - to ﬁ nd whether aerobic capacity is associated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)’ three classes, for smokers and non-smokers. Methods: In a cross-sectional study using criteria-based sampling a total of N = 60 smokers & non-smokers were included from the Delhi NCR region. IPAQ, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), Heart Rate, Systolic Blood Pressure, Diastolic Blood Pressure, and PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels were recorded. A comparison of smokers and non-smokers was performed using z test. Smokers and non-smokers were divided into three classes using physical activity levels and compared for aerobic capacity. The correlation of aerobic capacity with variables was seen using Pearson’s correlation coeﬃ cient. Multiple R was checked to study the model of cause and eﬀ ect for aerobic capacity. Results: Signiﬁ cant diﬀ erence is seen between smokers and non-smokers in the aerobic capacity (Mean ± SD smokers - 65.22 ± 8.73 ml/kg/min; Mean ± SD non-smokers 60.04 ± 7.7 ml/kg/min p value = 0.00). For non-smokers, a low level of physical activity shows a strong correlation with aerobic capacity (r = 0.78; p = < 0.05). No correlation of aerobic capacity is seen with physical activity levels among smokers. Aerobic capacity shows a signiﬁ cant negative and moderate correlation with PM 2.5 (r = -3.1; p = 0.016). The multiple R coeﬃ cient value for the model of cause and eﬀ ect is 6.99 with a p - value of 0.0449 for this. Conclusion: Smoking aﬀ ects aerobic capacity signiﬁ cantly for young men. High and moderate levels of outdoor physical activity do not increase aerobic capacity in areas with high PM 2.5 , whereas low levels show a positive correlation among non-smokers only.


Introduction
Aerobic capacity is a hallmark of health.Smoking is a major threat to the health of young men, which approximately kills 8 million people in a year as per the World Health Organization (WHO).The number of deaths due to smoking-related diseases will reach more than 8.3 million by 2030 [1].Approximately 80% of deaths due to smoking will occur in developing countries [2].Smokers who are involved in moderate to high levels of regular physical activity show a lesser decline in their lung function and a lower risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).There is an inverse association between smoking and physical activity, for itness.Therefore, it is believed that if someone does regular itness exercises to maintain his health he can counter the negative effects of smoking.It is because the in lammatory markers which are produced in our body by smoking can be suppressed if there is cardio-respiratory itness because of physical activity [3].aerobic capacity and may give bene its to smokers as well as non-smokers.People working outdoors or playing in the open are exposed to high levels of these pollutants [6] as seen in Figure 1.It is reported to have adverse effects on cognition and brain [7,8].What are the ill effects of air pollution on aerobic capacity in smokers or non-smokers has not been reported or explored?It is expected that physical activity shall be a determinant of aerobic capacity, along with this age, resting heart rate, smoking, and obesity are also prominent factors for aerobic capacity.Anthropometric measures like Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference, and neck circumference may also affect the aerobic capacity and are confounders for this [9,10] and were checked (Table 1).
Ambient air pollution -particulate matter has levels as per size -PM 10 , PM 2.5, and ultra-ine particulate matter, but now it has a focus on PM 2.5 , which is very smaller particles less than 2.5 microns that can go into the alveoli and may stay there get into the blood as well [11].It is invisible to the naked eye.Burning garbage, stubble burning, kutcha road, and construction activity are some of the causes of the increase in the concentration of PM 2.5 in Delhi near the capital region (NCR) [12].The smoking and non-smoking population both are exposed to air pollution.
The purpose of the study was to explore the effects of PM 2.5 and physical activity, and the effects of smoking on aerobic capacity, or whether there is a difference in the aerobic capacity of the two is yet another aspect we have explored.The study was carried out using a sample from Delhi NCR, and the results are explained using tables in the following sections.

Study design
Cross-sectional study design a sample of 60 young adults of age between 18 -27 years was collected from the University population living in Delhi NCR, during April-May 2019 as seen in the low chart of Figure 2.
Sampling method: Criteria-based sampling.

Sample size
A sample of 60 participants including 30 Smokers -smoking at least 5 cigarettes per day for at least 2 years, and 30 non-smokers who have never smoked and living in areas with higher PM 2.5 .The calculation of sample size was based on smoking proportions in the general population.0.775 was taken as the unexposed proportion for a z-test.With continuity correction total sample size came out to be 57.

Selection Criteria: a) Inclusion criteria:
• Males Group allocation: N = 100 young men were invited to participate.N = 60 participants were included and divided into 2 groups (30 in each) as per smoking history (smokers and non-smokers) -living in areas with higher PM 2.5 .This is seen in the low chart in Figure 2.
Procedure: all the participants who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study were provided with written informed consent prior to the study.Those participants N = 40 who did not meet the criteria disagreed to ill out the consent form were excluded from the study.Ethical approval was granted by the AIPT, AUUP institutional committee for NTCCs.
All the participants were explained about the procedure and the purpose of the study.Written informed consent was taken.Before taking the reading they were demonstrated every test they were required to undergo.
The level of physical activity of both smokers and nonsmokers was determined by the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) [13] -short form, in which the total energy expenditure was calculated in terms of metabolic equivalent task-minutes per week and time spent in those physical activities.Participants were asked to note the time they spend in various physical activities in a typical week and were then asked to answer the questions in the questionnaire even if they didn't consider themselves to be a physically active person.They were asked about the time they spend in various activities like aerobic exercise, heavy lifting, cycling, running, light weight lifting, etc.In answering the questions, the participants were explained before attempting the questionnaire that 'vigorous-intensity activity' are the activities that require hard physical effort and causes a large increase in breathing or heart rate, 'moderate-intensity activity' are activities that require moderate physical effort and cause small increases in breathing or heart rate and then about the walking for 10 minutes at a time in a day.
After illing out the questionnaire, the participants were assessed for their neck circumference and waist circumference.Following this, the peak expiratory low rate was observed using a peak low meter with the following procedure, irst of all, before the initial use, the reading was kept at zero.After that the subjects were asked to take a deep breath and the mouthpiece of the peak low meter was put into the subject's mouth.The lips were asked to keep tight around the mouthpiece.In one breath the hardest blow was asked to do rapidly.Three readings were taken and the maximum readings with this procedure were marked as the highest reading.
For the aerobic capacity, QCT -a valid step-up test was administered [14], where the participants were irst described the test and its procedure was such that participants were asked to sit on a chair and relax, after that their resting heart rate was irst calculated by carotid pulse for 15 seconds and then was multiplied by 4 to calculate beats per minute.Blood Pressure was checked using a dial sphygmomanometer.After that, they were asked to step on and off the stool for 3 minutes at the beats of a metronome at a rate of 24 steps up per minute.Stopwatch was started when the subjects started the test and immediately stopped after a period of 3 minutes.After completion of the test, they were seated down and carotid pulse rate was assessed from the ifth to the twentieth second of the recovery period for 15 seconds and was again converted to beats/min, and BP was measured.After this 1-minute rest was given to participants and again their heart rate and BP were measured and noted down.
A regular noting of the air quality index was ensured on the days whenever data was collected from a universal site regarding the air pollution in Delhi NCR (https://aqicn.org/city/india/up/noida/sector-125/) [4].

Data analysis
Statistical analysis of the data included descriptive quantitative statistics and was seen in terms of mean and standard deviation of age, BMI, waist circumference and neck circumference, PM 2.5 & PM 10 levels.For inferential analysis, Pearson's correlation coef icient was used to determine the association between physical activity and aerobic capacity.Rvalue was calculated for different variables.T-test was used for comparison of aerobic capacity in smokers and non-smokers.A regression analysis was done for aerobic capacity and the effect with other variables including PM 2.5 and PM 10 .Multiple R -which checks the strength of linear regression and is the coef icient of multiple correlations checking aerobic capacity as a dependent variable and all others as the independent variable.A p-value of 0.05 was used as the level of signi icance.

Results
The results are summarized in the following tables, Table 1 is having descriptive data, and Table 2 is inferential data of aerobic capacity between smokers and non-smokers.Tables 3,4 are comparing the physical activity levels for their association with aerobic capacity for smokers and nonsmokers respectively.Tables 5,6 are showing the association of aerobic capacity as regression and correlation coef icients.https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jcmhs.1001036IPAQ, PEFR, and VO 2 values for smokers and non-smokers are seen in Table 1, there is a signi icant difference in the aerobic capacity for smokers and non-smokers as expected (Table 2).Nicotine in cigarette smoke has many adverse effects on health and a decrease in aerobic capacity is the result of them.There are many variables that explain the aerobic capacity [9,10,15,16] other than smoking.The variables considered by the present study have given signi icant Multiple R as seen in Table 6, thus explaining the QCT-derived aerobic capacity variation for the participants -young men, urban population (N = 60) seen in Table 3. Delhi NCR's air quality index of PM 2.5 ranged from 85 to 263 and had a mean of 155.6 with an SD of 43; PM 10 ranged from 78 to 213 and had a mean of 127 with an SD of 41, during the data collection days as checked from air quality index site [4].Aerobic capacity is dependent upon cardiac output (HR x SV) and the extraction of oxygen from arterial blood by working muscles according to Fick's equation -VO 2 = CO x CaO 2 -CvO 2 {Fick's equation} [17][18][19].The advent of PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels in the already polluted environment at very high levels can lead to a situation whereby some unexplored mechanisms of PM 2.5 not only decrease the aerobic capacity levels but increase morbidity and mortality.These effects may vary in smokers and non-smokers who exercise or are sedentary [19][20][21][22]23].
Smoking decreases aerobic capacity as seen in the mean values and z-test of QCT-derived aerobic capacity in Tables 2,3.QCT is signi icantly different between smokers and nonsmokers.However, when grouped according to physical activity levels the smokers have shown no correlation between QCT-derived aerobic capacity with physical activity (Table 4); a strong and signi icant correlation is seen between low physical activity and QCT-derived aerobic capacity among non-smokers (Table 5).Why it is opposite to expectations?Leisure time physical activity has been reported not to affect the aerobic capacity in the elderly [15], it in luences their metabolic function, and however, the multi-collinearity exists between the number of variables.In the present study only in the non-smoking group, there is a statistically signi icant (p < 0.05) correlation between low levels of physical activity and aerobic capacity.In the case of smokers, there is no correlation (Tables 4,5).In regression analysis of multiple R, the IPAQ has a coef icient of 2 which states there is an increase of two factors when physical activity is increased by 1 factor, but it has a non-signi icant p -value (0.458).Thus, in the present model and urban population of Delhi, NCR physical activity is not a signi icant factor for aerobic capacity, and limiting physical activities on polluted days may strongly in luence the aerobic capacity positively (r =0.78) as seen in Table 4.

Discussion
The green environment has been reported to be more bene icial for physical health as compared to the urban environment.What all factors produce such change is largely unexplored, indoor plantation may be the future [24][25][26] The concentration of PM 2.5 -(PM 2.5 -C) in the form of ambient pollution or a dust storm has been reported to cause in lammation and DNA damage [27] and is associated with a Shows a signifi cant diff erence between the QCT-derived aerobic capacity of smokers and non-smokers as analyzed using the z-test.(Z = 2.5, 2-tailed).Shows the association of the various levels of physical activity according to the IPAQ with the aerobic capacity of smokers.The r value for high, moderate, and low PA is not correlated with the aerobic capacity in smokers.decline in aerobic capacity.Mechanisms of decline in aerobic capacity-There is temporal variation in the PM 2.5 -C where features like construction activity, ire from farm burning, or industrial areas can spike its levels [28].Various mechanisms like thrombotic activation, oxidative damage, and increased in lammation have been cited as few known possible mechanisms for the deterioration of vascular patency with increasing PM 2.5 -C.Due to a decrease in heart rate variability caused by the PM 2.5 levels adverse effect on the heart, and changes in endothelial function the cardiac out may get affected.The function of red blood cells is also disturbed and it produces a decrease in the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood [29][30][31][32].These changes may be analyzed speci ically in different studies for speci ic locations and are not covered in the present study which is a limitation.
Ambient air-pollution mainly a concentration of PM 2.5 (PM 2.5 -C) has been recognized as a modi iable risk factor for coronary artery disease [33], in the present study diseasespeci ic populations were not studied.Also, restrictions on physical activity due to ambient air pollution are a secondary complication of poor air quality, thus remaining indoors may be the new advice.-It is a startling paradigm shift of age-old health beliefs.Pulmonary variables like FEV1 and FVC may have produced a change in the studied population in aerobic capacity and were not checked in the present study which is a limitation.Only young men are included, and women are not tested this is a limitation.However, the next question is if outdoor physical activity is considered harmful now, what are the options as everything can't be indoors-however outdoor physical activity can be modi ied with the usage of masks and also there are reports of variation in PM 2.5 levels [28] and it is reported by the national database as seen in Delhi.https://aqicn.org/city/delhi/), speci ic masks with a PM 2.5 ilter and tested for this are believed to be helpful [34].Many individuals suffer from respiratory illness, such populations should be advised about the health hazards of air pollution while involved in exercises and physical activities and they must adapt to it by using preventive measures such as avoiding excessive outdoor physical activity, using a speci ic ilter /mask to avoid direct exposure with the pollutants during outdoor physical activity.

Conclusion
Smoking signi icantly impairs aerobic capacity, high level of outdoor physical activity is recommended in clean air, low level of physical activity is advised in areas with high PM 2.5 levels.Outdoor physical activity guidelines may include mask usage and checking air pollution levels.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Aerobic capacity (QCT) in Delhi NCR and environmental, and lifestyle factors.

Assessment for aerobic capacity etc Analysis and results
Study fl ow chart -showing population and sample as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, allocation based on the smoking history.The variables physical activity checked by international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ), aerobic capacity checked by Queen's college step test, and PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels from pollution control board website data. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jcmhs.1001036

Table 2 :
Z Test between QCT-derived aerobic capacity of smokers and non-smokers.

Table 3 :
Association of aerobic capacity and physical activity in smokers.

Table 4 :
Association of aerobic capacity and physical activity in non-smokers.

Table 6 :
Pearson's correlation coeffi cient of aerobic capacity (QCT) with other variables when all 60 participants are considered.Shows the correlation coeffi cients of various variables with QCT and their corresponding p-value.Signifi cant p = 0.16 and moderately negative r = ─.31correlation is seen with PM 2.5 only.All other Pearson's correlation coeffi cients are non-signifi cant and weak.(BMI-body mass index, RHR-resting heart rate, IHR-heart rate after 1 min of test, RPP -rate pressure product, DBP-diastolic blood pressure, SBP-systolic blood pressure, IPAQ-International physical activity questionnaire, PM 2.5 -particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns, PM 10 is particulate matter smaller than 10 microns, PEFR-peak expiratory fl ow rate). https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jcmhs.1001036