Boosting Student Achievement in Basic Science with Innovative Technology-Enabled Assessment Package

Main Article Content

Hannah Bosede Bankole
Jeremiah Gbenga Adewale

Abstract

The persistent decline in junior secondary school students’ performance in Basic Science in Nigeria underscores the need for innovative instructional strategies. This study examined the impact of the Innovative Technology-Based Assessment Learning Package (ITBALP) on the achievement of JSS Two students in Ibadan, with gender as a moderating variable. Grounded in constructivist learning theory, the study used a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design across six schools, with 150 students randomly selected. Schools were assigned to three groups: ITBALP with feedback and remediation (FR), ITBALP with feedback only, and a control group taught using conventional textbook methods. The Basic Science Achievement Test, validated with Cronbach’s alpha (r = 0.79), served as the instrument. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA at p = 0.05, and assumption checks confirmed robustness. Results showed a significant main effect of treatment on achievement (F(2,131) = 294.4, p < 0.05), with the FR group achieving the highest mean score (x̅ = 82.30), followed by the feedback group (x̅ = 63.04), and the control group (x̅ = 32.10). Gender had no significant main effect, and there was no treatment-by-gender interaction, indicating that ITBALP benefits both male and female students equitably. The findings underscore the value of integrating technology-enabled assessment with feedback and remediation to foster active, self-paced learning and improve science achievement. The study contributes to knowledge by operationalizing constructivist principles through digital assessment tools, offering evidence-based recommendations for teachers, curriculum planners, and policymakers to strengthen inclusive science education in Nigeria.

Article Details

Bankole, H. B., & Adewale, J. G. (2026). Boosting Student Achievement in Basic Science with Innovative Technology-Enabled Assessment Package. Journal of Community Medicine and Health Solutions, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jcmhs.1001072
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Bankole HB, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Urevbu AO. Methodology of science teaching. Lagos: Juland Education Publishers; 2016. Available from: https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Methodology_of_Teaching_Science.html?id=72VaABtL4noC&redir_esc=y

Da Silva JGC. Science and scientific method. Int J Sci Res. 2022;11(4):621-633. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR22412084104

Coccia M. The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics. Scientometrics. 2020;124(1):451-487. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-y

Wu H. Revealing natural laws and exploring the world: An introduction to scientific research methods. 2024.

Webb M, Gibson D. Technology enhanced assessment in complex collaborative settings. Educ Inf Technol. 2015;20(4):675-695. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9413-5

Alavi SM, Dashtestani R, Mellati M. Crisis and changes in learning behaviours: Technology-enhanced assessment in language learning contexts. J Further High Educ. 2022;46(4):461-474. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1985977

Khan RA, Jawaid M. Technology enhanced assessment (TEA) in COVID-19 pandemic. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S108. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2795

Kumar A, Sarkar M, Davis E, Morphet J, Maloney S, Ilic D, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in health professional education: a mixed methods study protocol. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:439. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02871-w

Jopp R. A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teach High Educ. 2020;25(8):942-958. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637

Zajda J. Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In: Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 35-50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3

Kumari G, Kumar N. Constructivism in learning. Educ Quest. 2022;13(3):207-213. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30954/2230-7311.3.2022.5

Saleem A, Kausar H, Deeba F. Social constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning environment. Perenn J Hist. 2021;2(2):403-421. Available from: https://doi.org/10.52700/pjh.v2i2.86

Devedžić VB, Devedžić M. Technology-enhanced assessment at universities and in schools: An initiative. Int J Learn Teach. 2019;11(3):89-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v11i3.4319

Liccardo A, Gargano A, Pastena A. The gender of science: A scientific analytically-based project to enhance secondary school students’ awareness of gender stereotypes in STEM. Educ Sci. 2025;15(3):270. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030270

Towolawi KO, Onuka OUO. Students’ computer skills and students’ achievement in senior secondary school biology in Ogun State, Nigeria. Int J Comput Appl. 2018;179(24). Available from: https://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume179/number24/towolawi-2018-ijca-916435.pdf

Liu CC, Liu SJ, Hwang GJ, Tu YF, Wang Y, Wang N, et al. Engaging EFL students’ critical thinking tendency and in-depth reflection in technology-based writing contexts: A peer assessment-incorporated automatic evaluation approach. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(10):13027-13052. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1007/s10639-023-11697-6

Omotayo SA. Effect of dynamic geometry software and e-learning cycle on students’ achievement, interest, and retention in senior secondary school geometry in Ibadan [PhD dissertation]. Ibadan: University of Ibadan; 2016. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.664985

Oludipe BD, Oludipe DI. Effect of gender and science anxiety on Nigerian junior secondary students’ academic achievement in basic science. NIU J Soc Sci. 2019;5(3):191-199. Available from: https://www.kampalajournals.ac.ug/ojs/index.php/niujoss/article/view/589

Sebastian-Tirado A, Felix-Esbri S, Forn C, Sanchis-Segura C. Are gender-science stereotypes barriers for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Front Psychol. 2023;14:1219012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219012

Usman H, Yew WT, Saleh S. Effects of van Hiele’s phase-based teaching strategy and gender on pre-service mathematics teachers’ geometry achievement in Niger State, Nigeria. Int J Pedagog Dev Lifelong Learn. 2020;1(1):1-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i1.6